HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > Fed up with US? Try OSCE...

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
Fed up with US? Try OSCE...
OSCE’s ascension is the proof of NATO’s failure in ending conflicts
22/02/2007

With the disintegration of Soviet Union in the early 1990s, and with Russia becoming more of an ally than a threat, the viability & existence of NATO was no doubt at stake. Yet, with it being clear that the dismantling of NATO would be equal to the loss of US influence and control on European issues, it was taken for granted that under no circumstances would NATO be diluted. But with the passage of time and absence of any major threat to Europe from the so-called hostile nation state and with the increasing hegemony of USA over international affairs, the rise and increasing prominence of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation from Europe (OSCE) has been a foregone conclusion. OSCE, a legacy of the Cold War era, today has around 56 countries as its members, which permeate the typical East-West European divide of the past. And the most important attribute of OSCE being that it endeavours to solve conflicts and differences with peaceful means and not through bigger conflicts, the way US does through NATO or Security Council. Even though it has always been loudly said that NATO & OSCE are not at loggerheads and rather work in synergy, the failure of NATO to better the situation in Kosovo, Serbia or the near failure of the British-American strategy in Iraq, has been glaring. With the increasing possibility of an American invasion in Iran to avenge the Iranian intervention in Iraq (Iran is alleged to have funded the pro-Shia militias who are fighting the allied forces) might make the distancing of Europe from the US or any US-led consortium, more of a reality than just a hypothetical possibility.

With many non-European countries becoming partner states (Japan, South Korea, Israel are partners for cooperation), OSCE might just be on course to replace NATO. Reason? This world desperately needs peaceful means and not ‘aerial assaults’ to stop conflicts.

By:- B&E
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.