HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > ‘Madam’ President? For a change

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
‘Madam’ President? For a change
The United States has maintained a historic psyche that has promoted male chauvinism blatantly
08/03/2007

In the likelihood of Hillary Clinton becoming the 45th President of the oldest democracy of the world, Bill Clinton has a completely white chance (amusingly, as opposed to a ‘fair chance’) of being literally labelled the “First” gentleman of United States of America. This has its genesis in the fact that US, a 230-year-old democracy that has hypocritically taught human rights and gender equality to the rest of the world, has maintained a deafening silence on raising women to the highest ranks of power.

It must be noted that ‘universal adult suffrage’ could be assigned to American women only in 1920, that is, after the passage of the 19th Amendment to their Constitution. But that amendment, ironically, didn’t remove the discrepancy in Article II of American constitution that declares that “the executive power shall be vested in a President of the USA. He shall hold his office during the term of four years.” Using the gender anomaly, one of the Baptist Ministers, named Rev. Rusty Weller, has been conducting a petition drive in the country to ‘ban’ women from seeking ballot access to US Presidency! His basic contention – four times in Article I, Section 7, ‘President’ is referred to as a man and 20 times overall the President’s gender is specifically mentioned to as male – might be debatable, but it proves that the undercurrent psyche of male chauvinism in US is clearly constitutionally defined.
Against this, gender representation in countries that have been on the radar screen of US criticism has been illuminating. Alexandra Mikhailovna Kollontai happened to be history’s first female minister within America’s bête noire, Bolshevik Russia. Her record as people’s commissar (in 1917) and as a diplomat, was phenomenal. In 1960, Sri Lankan Sirimavo Bandathranaike became the first female Prime Minister of any country in the world. Indira Gandhi ascended to power in India in 1966, while Margaret Thatcher occupied 10, Downing Street, in 1979. In America’s nearest neighbourhood, The Dominican Republic, Eugenia Charles ascended to power in 1980. In the Israel of 1969, Golda Meir was the 4th Prime Minister to occupy office. Much before Thatcher, Meir was called an ‘Iron Lady’ (David Ben Gurion euphemistically called her “the only man in Israeli cabinet”!). While Benazir Bhutto became Pakistan’s Prime Minister in 1988, Tansu Ciller of Turkey occupied the PM’s office in 1993 taking a stand against their staunch ally US.

And so on so forth. Not that woman empowerment is singularly an issue that one can use to devastate the US, but the fact is that combined with the innumerable undemocratic vagaries being perpetrated by the US, it is quite clear that democracy, for the US, is hypocrisy. So much for democratic equality!

By:- B&E
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.