HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > McKinsey?

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
McKinsey?
The firm continues its ill-logic!
30/11/2006

Despite global studies (KPMG, NYSE, Booz Allen Hamilton etc) confirming that between 60 to 80% mergers and acquisitions (M&As) always fail, and despite their own studies showing how more than 50% M&As always result in destruction of shareholder value, Mckinsey seems to have suddenly woken up with gregarious findings that the best method to clean up the Indian banking system is for the government to allow its stake in banks to be acquired by others. McKinsey amusingly claims that this “cleaning up” might add around $47 billion to the GDP every year and an additional tax revenue of $11 billion.

Perhaps they cannot be blamed, can they. McKinsey has had a vibrant background of providing illogical inferences. In their 2006 report titled ‘Accelerating India’s Growth’, McKinsey incorrectly claims that RBI has set a lower limit for Indian banks’ lending to priority sector (small scale industries, agriculture et al) at 36% of net credit of any bank. The figure set by RBI in reality is 40%. And in reality, and thankfully so, the amount all banks currently lend to the priority sector is a smashing 57% of their net credit.

Worse, McKinsey’s sophomore logic also inanely champions that the priority sector is actually loss making, therefore lending should be reduced with immediate effect. B&E has repeatedly criticised any such move to RBI. Vindicating our stand, RBI, as a slap to McKinsey’s so-called findings, on November 11, 2006, has drafted a move to actually increase the above mentioned limit of 40%.

As the Grameen Bank example (where Muhammed Yunus, the 2006 year Noble peace prize winner, is the founder head) has shown in Bangladesh, rather than reducing lending to the priority sector, banks can well do with structural reforms, improving efficiency and reach with rural masses. For information, Grameen Bank’s operating income last year was a stupendous 5 billion taka! How’s that for priority sector lending?

By:- B&E
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.