HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > Notional Env’mt Policy

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
Notional Env’mt Policy
The NEP on paper is a reality now, but in reality is a distant dream
14/06/2007

The National Environment Policy (NEP) Draft Policy 2004, cleared by the Cabinet after two years, though propagated as India’s commitment towards a positive contribution to international environmental efforts, actually is a flaw-filled and near moribund attempt. The crux of NEP revolves around conservation, livelihood security, integration of environment and social development. But a strange Polluter-Pays-Principle (PPP) approach used extensively in this policy has been framed on the hypothesis that altering the price of the polluting commodity (through pollutant tax) would lead to a reduction in consumption of polluting commodity, thus in a reduction in their production. Sadly, studies reveal that these polluting commodities are primarily exported and are consumed by foreign firms which are relatively highly price inelastic, that is, their demand will not get affected by the proposed pollutant tax.

Additionally, the NEP has very strangely ignored the role of state governments in improving environmental standards. This despite the fact that most of the issues under the term ‘environment’ are within the powers of the state legislatures. But the strangest fact is that the NEP has been framed without a proper demographic study, thus clearly ignoring the differences in social lifestyle of people across regions, which decides the method of polluting and level of pollutant added to the environment. Hilariously, the NEP doesn’t even encourage public’s participation in improving the environment. Until all these flaws are corrected, the heading of this article will remain, unfortunately, true!

By:- B&E
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.