HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > Divided they stand

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
Divided they stand
South-South cooperation is in the realm of fantasy
28/06/2007

Post World War II, history of the world was marked by the decimation of political imperialism. Several countries in Asia and Africa that gained independence from the European powers were mired in poverty and destitution. Much needed economic aid and support to them, however, was illusory. The Bretton woods agreement that gave birth to the international financial institutions like the World Bank and the IMF, were forthcoming in charting the economic growth trajectory of the European countries devastated by war. But for the third world, they continued as the imperialist arm of the developed countries.

The South-South cooperation (SSC) that envisioned economic cooperation among the developing countries then emerged as a serious challenge to the North-dominated economic relations. The United Nations created a special unit for SSC in late 1970s and the Non-Aligned Movement established a group of South-South coordination in 1989. The SSC demanded increased cooperation between the newly industrialised countries and higher investment flow among them. The concept was important for several reasons. Firstly, it could help develop the under-developed regions of the world, and secondly, such a model of development lacked the cultural, political and military hegemonic overtures that marked the First world conceptualised ‘Globalisation’. This cooperation among the developing countries has been resented precisely because of these reasons and the undercurrent of opposition to the concept has ensured that such initiatives are not allowed to take off.

During the past decade, the number of transnational investment agreements among the developing countries has increased immensely. The number of bilateral investment treaties among the developing countries has grown from 47 in 1990 to 603 in 2004 (that included 107 countries). Similarly, preferential trade agreements have also increased in intensity among the developing countries (122 countries during 1990s). But if the quantum of investments are compared, they stand nowhere in front of the developed countries. Also, the differences between the financial might of the G-15 and the G-8 have been too glaring to ignore. Even the chinks in the armour of the developing countries have been revealing. For example, Chinese clamour for oil blocks across the globe has most often competed against India, even when both of them are developing countries. SSC has a great potential against oppressive globalisation led by the First World. But for that, developing countries will have to cooperate and not compete against each other.

By:- B&E
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.