HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > Keep the change; I’ll work for free!

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
Keep the change; I’ll work for free!
A daily wage promise is not enough to excite the rural youth...
11/12/2008

While many around the world are lamenting the loss of jobs and employment opportunities, many in India don’t mind letting go of opportunities at hand! Now who are we talking about here? The rural youth! In case of rural India, where still a plethora of opportunities are available in the Centre-run employment generation schemes, migrant workers who have started returning to their native villages (for lack of opportunities in urban land) are still not willing to engage themselves in any such government scheme? According to the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO), just about 133 individuals of every 1,000 in rural India aged 15 years or more is willing to earn a living from employment generation programmes such as Employment Guarantee Scheme, Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojana, National Food for Work Programme and National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS). What’s worse, by the time it comes to actually turning up for work, this number further shrinks to a pathetic 54 in every 1,000!

Various projects under these schemes include watershed development, drought proofing, sanitation and road constructions et al. The fact that 86.7% of rural dwellers choose not to be a part of these temporary jobs puts a question mark on the very efficacy of the state sponsored employment generation rural projects. Incidentally States with huge uneducated and low per capita income population observed higher participation in public works, the highest being in Chattisgarh, Rajasthan, Bihar and Jharkhand. In contrast, Kerala, Punjab and Karnataka, with better record of education and higher per capita income saw lower participations. Truly, the policymakers have to realise that promising a temporary pittance in the name of a ‘daily wage’ no more excites an educated rural youth to work in those public projects. Reason enough for the Centre to create real, permanent job opportunities

By:- B&E
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.