HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > Saam, Daam... a little more Daam

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
Saam, Daam... a little more Daam
The legal environment reflects the larger shame of Indian venality
23/07/2009

Were you feeling proud lately on how India’s banking system could teach US banks a thing or two about asset management? Well, the India growth story now also has lessons for the World Bank, but not in the manner you would be imagining. The World Bank initiated India Detailed Implementation Review (DIR) has exposed corruption in Indian health projects and has learned how to better tackle corruption in public procurement. Five out of five projects it studied in India (2006) were deemed to be extremely vulnerable to fraud. No wonder then that India ranks 103 out of 201 countries in the World Bank’s ‘control of corruption’ indicator for 2008.

Quite unfortunately, the malaise has spread wide and deep. Take, for instance, the entire arena of law enforcement. The country’s domestic investigating and law enforcing agencies are often accused of being sleazy, negligent, and flat inefficient. There is no dearth of shameful stories of negligence and corruption. The entire country was shocked when Manu Sharma, the accused in the Jessica Lal murder case, was acquitted by Delhi High Court. The accusation clearly pointed towards the Joint Police Commissioner for tampering evidence and trying to hush up the case. There was strong demand to involve CBI, but that was turned down too at that time.

CBI, too, is not beyond blame; its inefficiency was clear, for instance, in the Priyadarshini Mattoo murder case. The accused was let-off due to lack of evidence. The judge called it ‘deliberate inaction’ by the investigating agency. Then the kidney racket in Gurgaon led by Dr. Amit Kumar comes to mind. As per indications, he was tipped off by some insiders about possible police action (which helped him escape, though he was later caught). It is immaterial to call ourselves a rising superpower if we can’t provide swift, fair and efficient justice.

By:- Sayan Ghosh
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.