HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > 48 lives, 1 line...

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
48 lives, 1 line...
DMRC needs to ‘chin’ up its act
17/09/2009

Imagine a Delhi, where all major city points are neatly interconnected with each other through metro rail; safe, fast and modern. Now back to reality – look at what we are receiving in the bargain – complicated traffic diversions and accidents galore!

Not only will the Delhi Metro most probably remain unprofitable till time immemorial (public transport services have had this loss background globally) but sadly, the Delhi Metro might also become one of the biggest worker casualty projects. The first mishap, which killed two people, was hardly an eye opener and was forgotten as an anomaly. But a series of incidents followed, killing 48 construction workers and injuring 98 others (the construction of the Kolkata Metro Rail way back on October 4, 1984, reported lesser casualties). The most recent mishap took place near Lady Shri Ram College, when a metal construction bridge collapsed, immediately killing 6 people, and injuring many more. These accidents cause not only loss of lives, but also loss of property. In the last case mentioned above, the total loss amounted to a massive Rs.60 million.

One reason forwarded for such deaths is the speed with which such projects are being completed, in line with the Commonwealth Games, which is scheduled to commence in October 2010. Another reason relates to outsourcing. The construction work is outsourced to third parties by DMRC on a contractual basis. Although they have an obligation to adhere to strict quality controls, third party firms might not have the same ethical inclination towards the welfare of workers.

There is obviously the Construction Workers Act of 1996, and E. Sreedharan is a great example of ethical behaviour and professional deportment. Notwithstanding that, the blame for accidents has to be shared by DMRC, which has lapsed on monitoring the project implementation. Construction deaths happen worldwide (UCATT, UK’s largest construction union, says construction is the most dangerous industry in UK – 70 odd deaths occurred last year); but with around 8 to 10 lakh workers working on the DMRC project, the company needs to take an active viewpoint of how to reduce deaths dramatically. It’s a case of 48 lives, 1 line...

By:- Sray Agarwal
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.