HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > Mom deported?

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
Mom deported?
Need for the right perspective
13/05/2010

Some seemingly are aggrieved that on April 16, 2010 at the Chennai Airport, when the frail and paralysed mother of slain Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) chief Prabhakaran touched down from Malaysia to be treated at a Chennai hospital, she was denied entry by immigration officials and sent back by the same flight. Her name, it is said, was on the ‘Warning Circular’ list. What is hard to believe is that if that were the case, how did the Indian Embassy in Malaysia grant her a visa in the first place? Apparently, the embassy had granted her a medical visa for six months. Even in 2003, there were reports about how the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) chief Jayalalitha, when she was the chief minister of the state, had been opposed to Prabhakaran’s mother’s entry into Tamil Nadu! Clearly, the current Indian stand is not isolated to one party.

However, the controversy erupted into mammoth proportions as many parties having presence in Tamil Nadu, except AIADMK, criticised the Centre. Karunanidhi, who is known for being noncommittal on LTTE (he had once refused to accept LTTE as a terrorist outfit), criticized the Centre.

Although it might be easy to ignore this current issue as being simply a hyped up affair, one should give a passing mention that irrespective of the lady being Prabhakaran’s mother, there can be no ad hominem argument forwarded that therefore she too is a criminal. To the extent of believing in a human angle, one would say that the Indian government’s move to deport the lady was too fast too soon. But there is a logical angle to this story. If she had been allowed to land, the Indian authorities would have been immediately inundated by the Sri Lankan government’s communique to hand her over to them. India would have been immediately pushed into an unwanted corner, especially given the attempts to improve relations with the Rajapakse coterie. Evidently, Prabhakaran’s mother is not short of money. And the medical treatment she wishes here is available in other countries too. Thus, in all, well ignored.

By:- Sayan Ghosh
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.