HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  

Home > Scrutiny > Why Isn’t Japan being Sanctioned by IAEA?

   Case Studies  
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
   Other links  
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
Why Isn’t Japan being Sanctioned by IAEA?


Had Iran been the purveyor of a nuclear disaster, IAEA and most definitely US would have jumped on to the bandwagon to issue global sanctions against the nation. Today, Japan – a nation which criminally failed to make a fail-safe nuclear plant and has continued to lie to international communities about the amount of radiation leakage from Fukushima – is not even being castigated for its abhorring mistakes, leave alone being sanctioned

Years ago, a war was suddenly ended, and yet a grave crime was committed on humanity with the twin atomic bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. What made it worse was the nuclear race it initiated among nations, putting the entire mankind under serious threat. Not surprisingly, Japan, the first (and hopefully the only one forever) victim of a nuclear attack; stayed away from nuclear weapons, while it continued to judiciously use nuclear energy for peaceful ends. However, the country perhaps did not realise the perils of using nuclear reactors not insulated against the laws of nature. March 11, 2011 proved to be a day of mourning for Japan when it was hit by an earthquake followed by a tsunami; events that subsequently exacerbated the nuclear disaster at the Fukushima nuclear plants.

Yes, the lives lost are mourned. But what cannot be forgiven is Japan’s deliberate and criminal behaviour towards two critical issues: Firstly, it is unfathomable that a nation can claim that a tidal wave ensured that its nuclear reactors went out of control. Given the infinitely exponential danger levels of nuclear radiation, wasn’t it Japan’s primary responsibility to operate only fail-safe reactors that automatically shut off at the first instant of a natural disaster? Or is Japan, which experiences some of the maximum frequencies of earthquakes, peddling to us the theory that it didn’t know what a natural disaster was? Secondly, what Japan did by deliberately lying to the world about the nuclear radiation leakage levels from its four damaged nuclear reactors at Fukushima is not just a crime against humanity, but should immediately invite global sanctions by both the IAEA and the Western world. This irresponsible doublespeak from Japan is unpardonable – especially when the world is going to suffer hugely due to Japan’s intransigence, which includes its act of releasing radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean that killed millions of sea animals in a matter of one week.
The Fukushima incident is considered now to be the second-most severe nuclear plant disaster after the Chernobyl incident 25 years ago on April 26, 1986. But what was really surprising was that, despite knowing the extent of havoc that nuclear radiations can cause, Japan deliberately manipulated the information about radiation levels since the beginning of the incident. While the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) is the regulator of Japan’s nuclear industry, the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station was operated by The Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). Immediately after the disaster on April 12, 2011, NISA’s radiation estimate was 370,000 terabecquerels. Global agencies accepted NISA’s estimate as being true and honest. How wrong they were? Firstly, all climactic data on radiation levels was going against NISA’s fraudulent estimations – regions as far as Canada and United States were detecting radiation due to the Japan disaster. Secondly, while Japan had evacuated people in an area of 20 km around the plant, all radiation surveys showed high radiation exposure to people even 60 km away from the plant. On June 15, Japanese government shamelessly accepted this fact and issued new evacuation advisories for people living in the 60 km radius. More pathetically, NISA, in a report to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), accepted that their initial estimates were completely off the mark and increased the radiation leakage estimate to 770,000 terabecquerels. In the report, Japan admits that “it was unprepared for a severe nuclear accident.”

As per the World Nuclear Association, 100 millisieverts nuclear radiation a year is the limit that one can be exposed to, and exposure above this limit leads to a serious risk of cancer. As per present reports, radiation levels went as high as 400 millisieverts per hour, which could have been as lethal as a nuclear bomb! More surprisingly, Japan rated this terrible nuclear crisis at five out of seven on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES) initially. France’s nuclear safety authority ASN warned that the minimum should have been rating the disaster at level-six. Later, under extreme pressure, Japan raised the score to 7, indicating a ‘major nuclear incident.’

Clearly, the radiation impact on the environment and on humanity will remain much longer and worsen too. There are over 100,000 tons of highly radioactive water inside the buildings. Its decontamination is very lengthy, expensive and exhausting work. Radioactive particles are spreading through the air, which will also impact other nations. Three months since the incident, the nuclear plant is still leaking radioactive material.

Yet, if you go by the Japanese government’s claims, no direct death has occurred due to nuclear radiation; over 10,000 people have died in the earthquake so far and it cost around $250 billion to the Japanese economy. Over 180,000 people were evacuated from within a 20-30 km. radius of the accident. So far, only 160 people, as per the Japanese government, have been found exposed to radiation.

The report clearly indicates Japan’s reluctance in terms of releasing data and failure to control the crisis has been too severe to brush aside. Surprisingly, IAEA also has not castigated Japan for releasing false figures earlier. The international community also looks largely silent. One wonders whether the same magnanimous yogic response would have been present from international communities if Iran had been the perpetrator of this large a nuclear disaster. The facts cannot be ignored. Japan should be sued for criminal damage to environment, humanity, and various animal species. Immediate sanctions must be drawn against Japan to ensure that in the future, countries desist from such criminal negligence!

By:- Akram Hoque

Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.