HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > Ban Surrogate Advertising now

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
Ban Surrogate Advertising now
Liquor Product Advertising has been Banned; but Surrogate Advertising, often with The Use of Popular Celebrities, defeats The Purpose
21/07/2011

In India, just about every law comes with its own set of loopholes. The case of the ban on advertisements of liquor and tobacco products is no different. Surrogate advertising, the loophole in this case, is a welcome crutch for these brands, as they are not otherwise allowed to advertise their products directly.

Indian cricket team captain M. S. Dhoni promotes McDowell’s Soda, Ajay Devgan endorses Bagpiper Soda, Saif Ali Khan endorses Royal Stag Mega Music and the list goes on. Seagram (Royal Stag Mega Music & Mega Cricket), McDowells (soda), Kingfisher (soda & water), Hayward’s 5000 (soda & packaged drinking water), White Mischief (holiday packages), Imperial Blue (cassettes & music CDs), Royal Challenge (music CDs), Bacardi (cassettes & CDs), SmirnOff (cassettes & CDs) are some primes examples of surrogate products.

Godfrey Philips – manufacturers of Red & White – gives “Red & White Bravery awards” for social initiative. Wills Lifestyle does a great surrogate job for Wills in a sense and Gold Flake has ‘Gold Flake Expressions’ greeting cards.

Evidently, it is ridiculous to simply ban the product advertisements and leave go of surrogates to do whatever they wish. The government should immediately ban advertisements of products and services that purport to sell brands that are like-named as tobacco or liquor brands. Does that mean that Kingfisher Airlines should not be allowed to advertise? Of course, yes. Or else, they should change the name of their airlines brand. The very reason a company expands its brand beyond a product category is to ensure that the brand’s promotional campaigns advantage all product categories – Kingfisher a key example. And unfortunately, unless the government slams down on this backdoor entry of liquor and tobacco products into impressionable minds, Naomi Klein can take a walk.

By:-
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.