HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  

Home > Scrutiny > No one to ‘lie’ abroad?

   Case Studies  
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
   Other links  
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
No one to ‘lie’ abroad?
Many embassies are running without ambassadors, putting question marks on the countries that are unable or unwilling to employ them

As countries of the world increasingly compete for political, economic, military, resource – basically all kinds of power – diplomacy has become increasingly important. The diplomatic baton is carried by the ambassadors or High Commissioners (in the case of Commonwealth countries) presiding over the embassies in different nations. In spite of the importance and authority attached to the post of ambassadors in pursuing the political and diplomatic process in the target country, it is flabbergasting to find that a sizeable number of them are missing in most embassies of the world! In US, the most important country in the world to carry out diplomatic efforts, as many as 13 embassies have no ambassador. The fact that this list excludes Bhutan, Cuba, North Korea, Myanmar, Somalia and Iran with whom US does not have diplomatic ties makes it even more surreal! Similarly, 18 embassies in Japan are run without ambassadors while New Zealand has as many as 30! Surprisingly, with nine missing ambassadors, India has fewer vacancies in embassies than US!

Most of these absent ambassadors are from very small, little known and impoverished states: Togo, East Timor, El Salvador, et al in US; Gabon, Guyana, Haiti... et al in Japan; and Burkina Faso, Rwanda, Costa Rica et al in India. It is difficult to comprehend their trajectories and come to a conclusion about why they don’t have any diplomatic goals in countries much bigger and powerful than theirs! This ennui is perhaps brought about by their much superior counterparts refusing to recognise them on a respectable standing. In a quid pro quo example, US operates 34 embassies abroad that have no ambassadors. And again, the countries are mostly small and impoverished! For the laggards, this is truly a sordid story, one that threatens the perception of their national character.

By:- Sayan Ghosh

Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.