HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > No international migraine!

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
No international migraine!
The Country Terrorism Report published by The US seems more led by an Ulterior Agenda, as the report ignores the wolves and castigates the sheep when it comes to deciding who sponsors terrorism and who doesn’t
15/09/2011

Dalai Lama once aptly said, “Today, more than ever before, life must be characterized by a sense of universal responsibility, not only nation to nation and human to human, but also human to other forms of life.” As an anti-thesis to his terminologies on universalism, the Country Reports on Terrorism 2010 published by the US Department of State on August 18 lacks credibility, uniformity and above all a sense of universal responsibility.

In the latest report, al-Qaeda (AQ) has been identified as “the preeminent terrorist threat to the US in 2010.” The report has completely overlooked the fact that today, AQ is on the verge of collapse after Osama’s death and various other terrorist groups such as al-Shabab in Somalia (an attack by them on August 23, 2010 killed over 300) and Pakistan’s domestic Taliban have become more dangerous over time.

But the current report also makes many faux pas with respect to so-called factualities. Cuba, Iran, Syria and Sudan have been named “state sponsors” of terrorism activities. On one hand, the report says that “there was no evidence that it (Cuba) had severed ties with elements from Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)”; but on the other, it acknowledges that “the Cuban government maintained limited contact with FARC members, but there was no evidence of direct financial or ongoing material support”. Strangely, while terming Cuba as a “state sponsor” of terror, the US continues to refuse to handover Luis Posada Carriles (referred as “one of the most dangerous terrorists in recent history” by Peter Kornbluh of the National Security Archive) to Cuba. Posada has been convicted of a series of bombings and an assassination attempt on Fidel Castro in Panama.

But the most hilarious part is that the report ignores Pakistan in this “state-sponsored terrorism” group. While Pakistan has refused to hand over the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack suspects to India despite being provided with enough evidence against Hafiz Saeed (leader of Jama’at-ud-Da’wah), many US government representatives have many a time acknowledged and accepted that Pakistan as a nation has sponsored terrorism for long. But the report presumably doesn’t accept that premise.

As per the report, 75% (of total 11,500 attacks & 13,200 deaths) of terrorism attacks and deaths occurred in South Asia. But irrespective of that, no South Asian nation has been accused of being a “state sponsor” of terror or has been reported for not coordinating in counter-terrorism activities.

Cuba as a nation has a relatively “unblemished” record for fighting terrorism – few globally would debate that. Similarly, Sudan has worked as a cooperative partner in global counterterrorism efforts against al-Qaeda in 2010 but still appears on the list. The Venezuelan government officially “rejected” the report describing it as “plagued with false affirmations, political preconceptions, and veiled threats.” Its Foreign Ministry states that “the US State Department tends to classify as ‘terrorists’ or ‘complacent with terrorism’ those governments and political organizations that do not bow down in the face of its imperial intentions.”

Looking at the fine print in the report, that allegation does not appear to be too far off the mark.

By:- Amir Hossain & Mrinmoy Dey
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.