HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > Assad escapes for now

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
Assad escapes for now
For the Assad government, it is a major reprieve, but time may run out
27/10/2011

The Syrian Uprising, which was instigated by a paradigm shift in the classical pro-regime slogan from “God, Syria, Bashar, that is enough” to “God, Syria, Freedom, that is enough” in March 2011, has come at a colossal cost to the Syrian government. It has also divided the world into two poles. Polarised opposition by the BRICS nations with regard to UNSC’s resolution threatening military action & sanctions against Syria has spurred a fierce war of words.

When on March 17, 2011, the UNSC authorised the use of armed forces to protect Libyan civilians from violence initiated by their own government, that was a first in UNSC’s history. Subsequently, BRICS nations criticised the West for allowing NATO’s bombing campaign in Libya. Recently, France with the co-operation of Britain, Germany and Portugal drafted a similar resolution denouncing Syria’s crackdown (on anti-government protests), which the UN claims has killed more than 2700 people in the past few months. The resolution got nine supporting votes, but four countries – India, Brazil, Lebanon & South Africa – abstained while Russia and China vetoed the move as they want to protect Syria from a Libya-style intervention. That the Bashar al-Assad led Syrian government is non-democratic is not debated. What is being debated is the suspect intent of America and the Western world in targeting Syria rather than, say, Saudi Arabia, which has as bad a system of ruling autocracy.

Russia, in turn, has warned Assad of a “sad fate” unless he negotiates with the rebels and initiates reforms. Although Russia is hardly a country respectable enough in its own systems to issue advice, they do have a point. Assad may have escaped a UNSC sanction currently. But he has to necessarily take into account the growing concerns over human rights’ abuse by his personal armies. Well timed economic reforms can quieten even the most vitriolic opposition – Putin is the best example for that.

By:-
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.