HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > Wrong move

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
Wrong move
Non-traditional protectionism will delay economic recovery
08/12/2011

Economic uncertainty seems to be the new normal of late. It started with the housing bubble bust and the sub-prime mortgage crisis in the US and, as the world recovers, the EU region has been hit by a severe sovereign debt crisis.

Such a situation would eventually lead to inward-looking policies and promote protectionism. As a matter of fact, developed nations have resorted to restrictive measures in terms of trade policies. Trade comes very low down in the list of priorities for the Obama administration with the presence of powerful protectionist forces in the White House, notably the unions. The picture is not different in the EU region with a GDP growth rate of 0.2% for Q2 and Q3, 2011 and a negative external trade balance of €10.33 billion for the first nine months of 2011. Even when the crisis hit the region last time in the 1970s and 1980s, EU policy makers went through a lot of navel gazing. As per a recent report, the EU is considering long-term import tariffs against goods from Chinese steel pipes to plastic from the Gulf States. Moreover, the commission is under pressure from protectionist members like Italy and France to introduce an EU vetting procedure primarily to block inward foreign investment.

As per WTO, obvious protectionism (mainly border trade barriers) has affected just over 1% of international trade. However, it does not take into account non-traditional protectionism by ways of introducing complex domestic regulations like public-procurement restrictions, subsidies, product and environmental standards, et al. Moreover, this type of regulatory protectionism is more opaque and less constrained by WTO.

Such protectionist measures would only delay recovery and deepen the crisis. With strong domestic demand and relatively sound banking systems, economies like China, India, Brazil & Russia will lead the way out of crisis. If developed nations have to heal their economies, trying to stop the ascent of the third world is definitely the wrong medicine. What will they do if these third world markets start refusing them?

By:- Mrinmoy Dey
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.