HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  

Home > Scrutiny > They listened to us, in part

   Case Studies  
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
   Other links  
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
They listened to us, in part
The recent decision of the DGCA to imprison drunken pilots is something that we suggest a year back, but DGCA needs to read us again, properly!

At last, the Indian aviation ministry did it. After much talk and criticism, the ministry has decided to inculcate a policy of zero tolerance on safety issues through a new set of rules for punishing drunk pilots. As per recent amendments to the Aircraft Act’s Rule 24, drunk pilots will now face one year jail or fine up to Rs.5 lakh instead of just being prohibited from operating their flight if they fail in pre-flight breath tests. Interestingly, this amendment came after an year of B&E’s Scrutiny article titled “Drunk pilots should be jailed” (B&E issue dated 30/09/2010), in which imprisonment was demanded for all drunk pilots.

Earlier, tipsy pilots would get suspended for three months if they were found drunk for the first time and would be suspended forever for the second time. But this rule had many loopholes. We mentioned in our previous article, “In spite of alcohol tests being mandatory, airlines take a lenient stance to keep the schedules of flights intact”. Even though drunk pilots would like to claim that they did not break any law as they had been caught before take off, no leniency should be entertained from pilots or airlines.

We would also like to applaud the decision of the aviation ministry to make drinking before flights a legal offence for pilots with criminal culpability. In addition to that, the law has also empowered DGCA to take criminal action. But still, our demand has not been fulfilled completely. The law should be amended to include post-flight breath tests also as we highlighted in our story, “Till now, the DGCA has been monitoring pilots through breath analysers before the flight, without keeping a check on whether the pilot drinks during the flight”. In closed cockpits, that is very much a possibility. So the ministry still needs to go another step beyond their current “zero tolerance” level on aviation safety!


Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.