HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
Home Scrutiny Publications Under Cover Mus'ings  
 

Home > Scrutiny > Youthhood!

  
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
       
 
  
         
Scrutiny
  
Youthhood!
Unprotected. Uncared. Unnoticed
19/10/2006

At an age not old enough to be called adults and at an age not young enough to be called children, the quandary of the juvenile population has been intriguing. Their plight gets compounded by the fact that increasing number of juveniles in India are being associated with delinquent behavior involving personal and social disorganisation.

The Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 defines (after 2000 Amendment) male and female below the age of 18 years, as juveniles. In this susceptible group, the National Crime Record Bureau reports that share of crimes committed by juveniles to total IPC crimes has increased from 0.9% in 2001 to 1.0 % in 2002 & 2003. The same reports also gives a scary analysis of different sections, under which the alleged ‘crimes’ were committed. While arson and kidnapping constituted a significant percentage of the crimes, it were the cases registered under counterfeiting and dacoity that registered a sharp increase of 166.7% and 93.7%, respectively for the years 2002 to 2003. Under Special Local Laws (SLL), the cases registered were more under ‘adult’ sections like Indecent Representation of Women Act and the Explosive Act.

The case of a juvenile delinquent being totally different from the adult criminals, the difference exists in the process, philosophy and methods of treatment. Requiring counselling, care and rehabilitation, the Juvenile Justice System or its procreator, the civil society and the government has failed to nurture the most vulnerable section of Indian population. While poverty, family problems at home, impact of mass media can be reasoned to be the causes, the reformatory or the Borstal Schools have failed to be inspiring. It has been reported that these so-called correctional centers do not even have the basic amenities to meet the standards laid down by the Central Social Welfare Board. The solution then has to be structured, directed and holistic. And the responsibility for corrections has to be shared both by the government as also by the civil-society.

By:- The IIPM Think Tank
Back

  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.