HomeContact Site map   Google    www    iipm think tank
   
   
  Home > Scrutiny > International Issues > It's poor in English   
   
     
   Case Studies  
       
  Marketing    
  Human Resource    
  Information Technology    
  Finance    
  Strategy    
       
 
     
   Industries  
       
  Steel    
  Glass    
  Banking    
  Prophylactic    
  Auto    
  Hospitality    
  Energy    
       
 
     
   Other links  
       
  IIPM    
  Planman Consulting    
  Planman Marcom    
  Planman Technologies    
  Daily Indian Media    
  Planman Financial    
  4P's Business and Marketing    
  Business and Economy    
  The Daily Indian    
  The Sunday Indian    
  Arindam Chaudhuri    
  GIDF    
  Kkoooljobs    
       
 
  
         
International Issues
  
P O V E R T Y : U K

It's poor in English
Human development? Who cares

   The sun finally seems to have set in British Empire. In the citadel of capitalism and affluence, the third worldly phenomenon of poverty and deprivation exists in gigantic proportions. It is estimated that about 13 million people constituting about 17% (in 2002-03) of the population lived in poverty in Britain. While the poverty estimation in Britain is ranked at the level of households where the weekly income is below 201, rSearching for the lost future....esearches suggest that about 9.2% of Britain's population earn less than 168 while about 4.6% earn less than 134 a week. It is contended that more than the poverty rate, it is the intensity of poverty that gives the accurate picture of the deprivation in Britain.

The sections affected by poverty are varied. The Economic and Social Council contends that its victim is mostly the children, women, single parents, pensioners and the expatriate population. The UN's HDR contends that in 2002-03, 21% of total child population (about 2.6 million children) and about 67% of the Pakistanis and Bangladeshi lived in poverty.

The reasons are as varied as the poverty demographics. Skewed policies initiated by the government have resulted in widening the gap. Distinctly pro-rich growth pattern has led to a condition where the richest 10% of the population receive about 28% of disposable income. Similarly, the mean annual income of the richest one-fifth has increased about ten folds the rate of the poorest one fifth.

The poverty estimates have remained the same during the 1970s and 1980s, however it peaked in the 1990s. For the same time period, Gini co-efficient (reflecting inequality in a society) surged ahead from 25 to 35, which were the highest in world.

The requirement then is to combine the employment generation with wider economic pursuits for determining income distribution patterns. Poverty alleviation might be an anathema to the western world, but internal configuration of their society shows that they remain iniquitous and unfair.



  
 
 
       
Home | Scrutiny | Publications | About us | Contact us
Copyright @2010 iipm think tank. All rights reserved.